Analysis of Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 875 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2019/04/10 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: Fahrenheit 451 Essay Ray Bradbury Essay Did you like this example? Fahrenheit 451, which was written by Ray Bradbury, is a dystopian novel that explores the consequences of superficiality and knowledge. This story attracted me because I am interested in learning how society would be different if seeking out awareness was publishable. A positive aspect of this book is that it proposes a scenario in which everyone is in the mindset of every man for himself, therefore envisioning a cruel and dystopian world. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Analysis of Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury" essay for you Create order According to Bradbury, his book is a warning. It is a reminder that what we have is valuable sometimes we take that value for granted. (Bradbury, Page xi) Something which I found negative about Fahrenheit 451 was that at times I found the story too fast paced and hard to follow. The author who wrote the book still presents an insightful scenario. The main character, who is a man, can be seen as both the protagonist and antagonist. Montag shot one continuous pulse of liquid fire on him (Bradbury, Page 113), demonstrates the protagonist side of Montag by showing that he was tired of punishing people for reading, so he killed his boss by burning him. Montag wanted to comprehend books even though it was against his job It was a pleasure to burn. It was a special pleasure to see things eaten, things blackened and changed (Bradbury, Page 1) shows the satisfaction Montag receives from going to peoples homes and burning them down for reading books. Although Montag didnt understand why, he would burn peoples books. Writing gives us a warning about our future. Especially when the subject is a dystopian world with many correlations to our own. The story focuses on Guy Montag, Faber, Mildred, Clarisse, and Beatty living in a futuristic United States. The rising action occurs when Montag snatches a Bible and looks to Faber, an old English professor, for help in understanding books. The climax happens when Montag kills his boss and escapes into the forest in search of book lovers after a firefighter chase down. Scared for their lives, Montag and his group want to head back to their town. Montag loves his town but is afraid to return. He and his friend choose to go back even after the bombing. The story takes place in the United States sometime in the future from the time the book was written. Montag, who is feeling alone, somehow still spreads knowledge to an ignorant society. This works well in the novel. Montage has a paramount purpose but he is despised by everyone. Censoring creates peace and can be interpreted as the main theme of the novel. Colored people dont like Little Black Sambo. Burn it. White people dont feel good about Uncle Toms Cabin. Burn it. Someones written a book on tobacco and cancer of the lungs? The cigarette people are weeping? Burn the book . . . Serenity . . . Peace . . . (Bradbury, Page 57) Establishing the theme of a dystopian society, this text shows that people dont care about serious issues as long as there is peace. Apart from that, the secondary theme in the novel is letting technology take over your mind and life. Why they [the presidential candidates] were right in that parlor wall . . . One was always picking his nose . . . (Bradbury, Page 93) and, I cant talk to my wife; she listens to the walls (Bradbury, Page 78) show that the large television walls placed in everyones home have influence over everything. Also to who they vote for in the presidential elections. Voting creates a Democratic based governme nt system. The primary conflict in the novel Fahrenheit 451 is that the main character, Montag, feels a clash between what society thinks and his interest in what the minority has to say. Clarisse, a girl who just met Montag on his way home from work, somehow still presents him with many inquiries and happenings in her life that go against what society thinks is acceptable; I rarely watch the parlor walls . . . So Ive got lots of time for crazy thoughts (Bradbury, Page 7), Are you happy? (Bradbury, Page 7), and Do you ever read any of the books you burn? (Bradbury, Page 5) Also, when Montag goes to see Faber, he says, I stole it [a Bible] and Youre the only one who I knew might help me. (Bradbury, Page 77) The conflict can be defined as remaining in ignorance vs. attaining knowledge. The resolution was Montag and his book-lover group returning to the city to build a new society. The man who burns books still leaves his town to start a new civilization. Montag who starts as the antagonist, but ends up being the protagonist in the novel. The author who wrote the novel is trying to give us a glimpse into a world in which everyone is superficial, ignorant, and free thought is banned. Something I took out from Fahrenheit 451 is that everyone should always be able form their own unique mindset. Valuing knowledge causes people not to live in a culture that dehumanizes for being different. People have different interests in book; nevertheless, I would recommend this book to anyone. Futuristic in nature, it has the ability to warn us not to follow the same direction as the nation and people of the book. Ray Bradbury presents negative scenarios but tells a profound story in the end. Analysis of Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury - Free Essay Example Sample details Pages: 4 Words: 1106 Downloads: 9 Date added: 2019/04/10 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: Fahrenheit 451 Essay Ray Bradbury Essay Did you like this example? Imagine living where people would get burned by firemen for having books. Somewhere where they would be more focused on athletics rather than core classes such as English, History, or Math. Fahrenheit 451 is based around this very thought and idea. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Analysis of Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury" essay for you Create order In the novel, Ray Bradbury wrote about a world where they were not allowed to read without losing their life. In this book people are more focused on television and their headphones. They are too busy or lazy to read. Eventually they made a rule that if they read or own a book the firemen will come to their house and burn them, their books, and their house. Mildred, Montags wife is way more interested in her television and headphones than her husband. She is so attached to technology she just reads peoples lips rather than actually hearing what they are saying. She also considers the people on her television to be her family. Another character who shows examples of these ideas of a world like this would be Montag. He is a firemen who had a line of family members ahead of him who passed the responsibility of being a fireman down to him. He never really put too much thought into the fact of having the job and maybe did it just because he enjoyed the smell of the karosyne. This is the lives of people in this book. In the novel books are banned and they cant read or own any books because people get offended and depressed because books are blunt and wont sugar coat everything just for them. People in the novel put off books and say they are not important. Books are important! The argument of books causing offence and depression could be right but people can take offence by from social media even worse than a book. This is because multiple people can see and comment on the idea. Also it can includes pictures and emojis plus photoshop to make them feel/look worse. People need to just accept themselves for who they are and deal with it; not be offended by every little thing that isnt exactly how they want it. If society can make it with all of the crap and racial sayings on social media then they darn sure better be able to handle a book. Books give less graphics and nobody can comment on the photos or scenes like a post or a movie scene. With a book people get to imagine the characters and how they talk or sound. That way they dont feel compared to them and dont have other people making comments on the post. In the book it states that books are burned because Colored people dont like Little Black Sambo. Burn it. White people dont feel good about Uncle Tom s Cabin. Burn it. Someones written a book on tobacco and cancer of the lungs? The cigarette people are weeping? Burn all, burn everything. Fire is bright fire is clean (57, Bradbury). This shows how easily the people are offended and how insecure they are with themselves. How they want everything said to fit perfect to their ears not always the truth. Also their solution to the problem. This goes in hand with the society in present day. People do not want to be offended or look lesser than another. With technology it is easy to read into ideas and feel picked on or laughed at. This is due to people making comments and movies making references. With a book people are not piping in and giving their unnecessary two cents. Books are important and do serve a purpose, they help peoples minds exercise and work to be able to get stronger and better at obtaining knowledge and good memory. When reading a book, they get to imagine what the characters look like and how they follow through with their actions and gestures. With a book they get to read the actual words rather than just hear people saying them and when they are stumped on a word, go to another book and look up the definition. While reading, they get to go to another place and time and imagine themselves in the setting. They get to imagine how the setting looks based on how they interpret what the books description says. While reading it works the brain cells and makes them stronger which then allows them to obtain knowledge quicker and easier with it sticking; memory that you get when reading whereas with a movie it is more just for entertainment. Books are not all about strengthening their brains cells but also are meant for entertainment, The y get to design the character as they would like to rather than a director doing it for them which makes the book more fun for them. In the book it says If you dont want a man unhappy politically, dont give him two sides to a question to worry him; give him one. Better yet give him none (58 Bradbury). Saying take a mans ability to choose how he wants to interpret something or feel about it will make him more happy. Knowledge is good for them and they think they have tons of knowledge but, they are really being held back from the potential of knowledge they could have. They have done this to themselves by planting stupid thoughts in their heads. A book is a loaded gun in the house next door. Burn it. Take the shot from the weapon (58,Bradbury). Sudjusting that the books are the weapons and they are the weapons. So if they take away the knowledge (books) they will be safe and away from harms way. They have limited themselves to what knowledge they allow themselves to learn or take in. They either learn what is presented to the on their television or by what they hear from friends or on the street. They do not have books or science blogs or dictionaries they pick up and start reading to obtain knowledge hens froth holding themselves back from their potential knowledge. All this because they all want to be treated fairly and not feel as a subordinate to another being or amongst their friends. Luckily America is not like this and people get to make their own decision on weather or not they want to read or not without the threat of being burned for doing so. Imagine/picture how many peoples lives would be ruined if society went to no books to keep their life. People who write books would be out on the streets looking for work and ways to stay out of trouble for making books.